Jan Constantine Ltd v Eva Noisternigg (Summary Decision_Transfer) [2011] DRS 9129 (20 April 2011)

Jan Constantine Ltd v Eva Noisternigg (Summary Decision_Transfer) [2011] DRS 9129 (20 April 2011)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9129
Parties
Complainant: Jan Constantine Ltd; Respondent: Eva Noisternigg
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jan Constantine Ltd

Complainant

Eva Noisternigg

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the domain name to Jan Constantine Ltd