Evans v. Edinburgh Corporation and Others [1916] UKHL 388 (28 March 1916)
Neither owners nor road authority are liable for injuries caused by the sudden opening of a door onto the street, as there is no breach of duty at common law and statutory provisions do not apply without proof of the street's status or permanent obstruction.
- Citation
- [1916] UKHL 388
- Parties
- Appellant: Evans; Respondents (owners): Binnie and Russell; Respondents (road Authority): Edinburgh Corporation (Lord Provost and Magistrates of the City of Edinburgh)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 1916
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Public Safety, Liability for Dangerous Premises, Statutory Duties of Road Authorities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evans
Appellant
Binnie and Russell
Respondents (owners)
Edinburgh Corporation (Lord Provost and Magistrates of the City of Edinburgh)
Respondents (road Authority)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Are owners liable for injuries caused by a door opening onto a street under common law?
- 2 Is the road authority liable under the Edinburgh Municipal and Police Act 1879 or Roads and Bridges (Scotland) Act 1878?
Ratio Decidendi
Neither owners nor road authority are liable for injuries caused by the sudden opening of a door onto the street, as there is no breach of duty at common law and statutory provisions do not apply without proof of the street's status or permanent obstruction.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed
- expenses awarded as allowed in forma pauperis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment