Playboy Enterprises International, Inc v ewca.org [2006] DRS 3409 (14 April 2006)
The complainant has established rights in the PLAYBOY mark and the domain name is confusingly similar due to a minor misspelling. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes abusive registration as it takes unfair advantage of and is unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, including by typo-squatting and diverting customers.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3409
- Parties
- Complainant: Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.; Respondent: ewca.org
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Nominet UK Domain Dispute / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Passing Off, Typo Squatting, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.
Complainant
ewca.org
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Nominet UK Domain Dispute / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has established rights in the PLAYBOY mark and the domain name is confusingly similar due to a minor misspelling. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes abusive registration as it takes unfair advantage of and is unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, including by typo-squatting and diverting customers.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of domain name playboyaccesories.co.uk to Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment