Mr M Gascoigne v Exasoft Ltd and 10 Digital Creative Ltd (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2021] UKET 1300830/2021 (23 August 2021)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondents.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2021] UKET 1300830/2021
Parties: Claimant: Mr M Gascoigne; Respondent: Exasoft Ltd; Respondent: 10 Digital Creative Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 23 August 2021
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr M Gascoigne

Claimant

Exasoft Ltd

Respondent

10 Digital Creative Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondents.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondents to pay compensation to the claimant

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.