Exel Computer Systems PLC v Revenue & Customs (NATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS : Exemptions and reliefs) [2018] UKFTT 346 (TC) (23 June 2018)
The Tribunal held that HMRC's claim for 2008-09 was time barred as no explicit agreement or specified payment on account was made to stop the limitation period. The provision of private fuel constituted a taxable benefit as employees received fuel for private use without timely reimbursement, failing to meet the requirements of section 151 ITEPA 2003. The arrangements did not amount to a fair bargain, and the benefit code was engaged. The section 8 decisions were not reduced as they were based on best judgement.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 346 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Exel Computer Systems PLC; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part; HMRC's claim for 2008-09 is time barred, but liability for other years upheld.
- Legal Topics
- National Insurance Contributions, Benefits in Kind, Limitation Periods, Employment Income, Car Fuel Benefit, Section 151 ITEPA 2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Exel Computer Systems PLC
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC's claim for Class 1A NIC for 2008-09 is time barred under the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the provision of car fuel to employees constituted a taxable benefit under ITEPA 2003
- 3 Whether employees made good the cost of private fuel within the required time to avoid a NIC charge under section 151 ITEPA 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that HMRC's claim for 2008-09 was time barred as no explicit agreement or specified payment on account was made to stop the limitation period. The provision of private fuel constituted a taxable benefit as employees received fuel for private use without timely reimbursement, failing to meet the requirements of section 151 ITEPA 2003. The arrangements did not amount to a fair bargain, and the benefit code was engaged. The section 8 decisions were not reduced as they were based on best judgement.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part; HMRC's claim for 2008-09 is time barred, but liability for other years upheld.
Orders
- HMRC's section 8 decision for 2008-09 is set aside as time barred.
- Liability for Class 1A NIC for tax years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2009-10, and 2010-11 is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment