Mr Sunil Jina v Exertis UK Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2020] UKET 3200693/2020 (28 July 2020)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal on that basis.

Citation: [2020] UKET 3200693/2020
Parties: Claimant: Mr Sunil Jina; Respondent: Exertis UK Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 28 July 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr Sunil Jina

Claimant

Exertis UK Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996
2 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal as a result of making a protected disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal on that basis.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed