C Woodcock v F Y Gym Ltd (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2025] UKET 2404339/2024 (20 January 2025)
The tribunal found that the redundancy was genuine but the respondent failed to follow a fair consultation process, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKET 2404339/2024
- Parties
- Claimant: C Woodcock; Respondent: F Y Gym Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Redundancy Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
C Woodcock
Claimant
F Y Gym Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy
- 2 Whether the redundancy process was fair and compliant with statutory requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the redundancy was genuine but the respondent failed to follow a fair consultation process, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment