Fibrelite Composites Ltd v Faifley Limited (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 18200 (28 December 2016)

Fibrelite Composites Ltd v Faifley Limited (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 18200 (28 December 2016)

The complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive or in bad faith under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2016] DRS 18200
Parties
Complainant: Fibrelite Composites Ltd; Respondent: Faifley Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes
Intellectual Property Domain Name Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fibrelite Composites Ltd

Complainant

Faifley Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent is abusive or in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive or in bad faith under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action taken