Fard v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 63 (TC) (18 January 2011)
Shares acquired by the appellant from his father were not 'subscribed for' within the meaning of section 574 ICTA 1988, as they were not issued by the company to the appellant in consideration of money or money's worth; therefore, loss relief was not available for those shares.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 63 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Farzad Fard; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Loss Relief, Share Subscription, Section 574 ICTA 1988
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farzad Fard
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to loss relief under section 574 ICTA 1988 in respect of shares acquired by transfer from family rather than by subscription.
Ratio Decidendi
Shares acquired by the appellant from his father were not 'subscribed for' within the meaning of section 574 ICTA 1988, as they were not issued by the company to the appellant in consideration of money or money's worth; therefore, loss relief was not available for those shares.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No relief for loss on shares acquired by transfer from family under section 574 ICTA 1988.
- Recommendation to HMRC to negotiate repayment terms and consider waiving interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment