EA124112021 [2023] UKAITUR EA124112021 (30 May 2023)

EA124112021 [2023] UKAITUR EA124112021 (30 May 2023)

The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof to establish the claimed relationship with the sponsor; the First-tier Tribunal Judge properly assessed all evidence and credibility, and no material error of law or unfairness was found.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] UKAITUR EA124112021
Parties
Appellant: Faustina Boadu; Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
30 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Appeal to Upper Tribunal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Family Permit, Dependant Child, Citizen's Rights Appeals, Documentary Evidence, Credibility Assessment
Immigration EU Law Family Permit Dependant Child Citizen's Rights Appeals Documentary Evidence Credibility Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faustina Boadu

Appellant

Entry Clearance Officer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Appeal to Upper Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant established she is the dependant child of the sponsor under Appendix EU (Family Permit)
  2. 2 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in its assessment of documentary evidence and credibility
  3. 3 Whether the judge acted impartially and followed Surendran guidelines

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof to establish the claimed relationship with the sponsor; the First-tier Tribunal Judge properly assessed all evidence and credibility, and no material error of law or unfairness was found.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The decision of the First-tier Tribunal stands; no error of law found; appeal dismissed.