Seabourn Cruise Limited v First Hosting [2007] DRS 4316 (21 March 2007)
The complainant established rights in the SEABOURN mark prior to the domain registration. The respondent engaged in a pattern of registering domain names corresponding to well-known marks without rights, including seabourn.co.uk, which was found to be unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights. The domain name is therefore an abusive registration and should be transferred.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4316
- Parties
- Complainant: Seabourn Cruise Limited; Respondent: First Hosting
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Abusive Registration, Trade Mark Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seabourn Cruise Limited
Complainant
First Hosting
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name seabourn.co.uk is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the SEABOURN mark prior to the domain registration. The respondent engaged in a pattern of registering domain names corresponding to well-known marks without rights, including seabourn.co.uk, which was found to be unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights. The domain name is therefore an abusive registration and should be transferred.
Court Disposition
Domain name transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name seabourn.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment