Unison v First4skills Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2017] UKET 2403353/2017 (25 October 2017)

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies and granted a protective award to the affected employees.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2403353/2017
Parties: Claimant: Unison; Respondent: First4skills Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 25 October 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of the claimants
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Unison

Claimant

First4skills Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies
2 Whether a protective award should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies and granted a protective award to the affected employees.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimants

Orders

Respondent to pay a protective award to affected employees

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.