Firsteel Ltd v Sherwin & Ors [1993] UKEAT 654_91_1312 (13 December 1993)
The Industrial Tribunal's decision that the respondents were unfairly dismissed was not perverse and was supported by evidence; procedural failures including non-disclosure and haste justified the finding of unfair dismissal. No error of law was identified.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 654_91_1312
- Parties
- Appellant: Firsteel Ltd; Respondents: Mr Sherwin, Mr Walker, Mr Devey, Mr Mills
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Firsteel Ltd
Appellant
Mr Sherwin, Mr Walker, Mr Devey, Mr Mills
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissals of the respondents were unfair within the meaning of S.57(3) of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978
- 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal's decision was perverse or unsupported by evidence
- 3 Whether procedural failures in redundancy selection render dismissals unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The Industrial Tribunal's decision that the respondents were unfairly dismissed was not perverse and was supported by evidence; procedural failures including non-disclosure and haste justified the finding of unfair dismissal. No error of law was identified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Firsteel Ltd is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment