Miss C Guinee v Firstsource Solutions Uk Ltd (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1600259/2016 (31 July 2017)

Miss C Guinee v Firstsource Solutions Uk Ltd (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1600259/2016 (31 July 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent could provide a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether the dismissal was fair and if any deductions from wages were unlawful.

Citation
[2017] UKET 1600259/2016
Parties
Claimant: Miss C Guinee; Respondent: Firstsource Solutions Uk Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the respondent
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Religion or Belief Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss C Guinee

Claimant

Firstsource Solutions Uk Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to religion or belief discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was subjected to sex discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent could provide a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether the dismissal was fair and if any deductions from wages were unlawful.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the respondent