Fisher Homes & Vision Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 361 (TC) (04 August 2010)
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for failing to pay VAT for period 10/09. The time to pay agreement was not entered into before the default arose and thus did not provide relief under section 108 Finance Act 2009. The appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 361
- Parties
- Appellant: Fisher Homes & Vision Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Default Surcharge Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Default Surcharge, Time to Pay Agreements, Reasonable Excuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fisher Homes & Vision Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Default Surcharge Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late payment of VAT for period 10/09
- 2 Whether time to pay agreements affected liability for default surcharge
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for failing to pay VAT for period 10/09. The time to pay agreement was not entered into before the default arose and thus did not provide relief under section 108 Finance Act 2009. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant's appeal against default surcharge penalty for period 10/09 is dismissed.
- Appellant advised of right to apply for decision to be set aside under Rule 38 and right to seek permission to appeal under Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment