Fitzpatrick Scaffolding Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 702 (TC) (26 November 2013)
The Tribunal held that insufficiency of funds due to general adverse economic conditions does not constitute a reasonable excuse under Schedule 56 FA 2009. There were no exceptional or unforeseen events specific to the appellant. Lack of specific warning or awareness of the penalty regime is not a reasonable excuse or special circumstance. The penalty was correctly calculated and not disproportionate. The appeal was dismissed and the penalty confirmed.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 702
- Parties
- Appellant: Fitzpatrick Scaffolding Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- PAYE Penalties, National Insurance Contributions, Finance Act 2009 Schedule 56, Reasonable Excuse, Special Circumstances, Proportionality of Penalty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fitzpatrick Scaffolding Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether insufficiency of funds constitutes a reasonable excuse for late payment of PAYE and NICs under Schedule 56 FA 2009
- 2 Whether lack of specific warning by HMRC is a reasonable excuse
- 3 Whether any special circumstances existed to justify a reduction in the penalty amount
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that insufficiency of funds due to general adverse economic conditions does not constitute a reasonable excuse under Schedule 56 FA 2009. There were no exceptional or unforeseen events specific to the appellant. Lack of specific warning or awareness of the penalty regime is not a reasonable excuse or special circumstance. The penalty was correctly calculated and not disproportionate. The appeal was dismissed and the penalty confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Penalty of £3,064.82 confirmed against the appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment