Dr C Meade v Floranova Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2024] UKET 3301479/2024 (31 October 2024)
The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure and suffered detriment, establishing liability under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 3301479/2024
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr C Meade; Respondent: Floranova Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Dr C Meade
Claimant
Floranova Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant suffered detriment due to making a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure and suffered detriment, establishing liability under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment