Mr R McNaught v Francis Quinn (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : National Minimum Wage : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1302017/2017 (1 December 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, not paid the National Minimum Wage, and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, constituting a breach of contract.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1302017/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr R McNaught; Respondent: Francis Quinn
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 December 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, National Minimum Wage, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Breach of Contract National Minimum Wage Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr R McNaught

Claimant

Francis Quinn

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether the claimant was paid less than the National Minimum Wage

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, not paid the National Minimum Wage, and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, constituting a breach of contract.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
Respondent to pay arrears for National Minimum Wage

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.