Robertson v. Bexley Community Centre (t/a Leisure Link) [2001] UKEAT 1516_00_0907 (9 July 2001)
It is arguable that the Tribunal erred in its approach to time limits, failed to address victimisation, may not have applied the correct legal principles, and that procedural irregularity and case management issues require examination at a Full Hearing.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1516_00_0907
- Parties
- Appellant: Francis Robertson; Respondent: Bexley Community Centre trading as Leisure Link
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal to proceed to Full Hearing
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Constructive Dismissal, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Robertson
Appellant
Bexley Community Centre trading as Leisure Link
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding no unlawful racial discrimination
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in treating incidents as time-barred
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to address victimisation
Ratio Decidendi
It is arguable that the Tribunal erred in its approach to time limits, failed to address victimisation, may not have applied the correct legal principles, and that procedural irregularity and case management issues require examination at a Full Hearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal to proceed to Full Hearing
Orders
- Matter to proceed to Full Hearing before the Appeal Tribunal.
- Chairman to provide an answer regarding the alleged ex parte conversation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment