Frank Bowen v IC (Preliminary Decision Environmental Information Regulations 2004) [2014] UKFTT 2014_0003 (GRC) (02 July 2014)

The Tribunal finds that a preliminary determination is required to establish whether the information requested is environmental within the meaning of the Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2014] UKFTT 2014_0003 (GRC)
Parties: Applicant: Frank Bowen; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 July 2014
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Preliminary Decision
Outcome: preliminary decision issued
Legal Topics: Environmental Information Regulations 2004, Access to Environmental Information

Information Law Environmental Law Environmental Information Regulations 2004 Access to Environmental Information

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Frank Bowen

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the requested information falls within the scope of Environmental Information Regulations 2004
2 Whether the Information Commissioner correctly applied the Regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal finds that a preliminary determination is required to establish whether the information requested is environmental within the meaning of the Regulations.

Court Disposition

preliminary decision issued

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.