Lycee Francais Charles De Gaulle v Delambre (Age Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0563_10_0504 (05 April 2011)

Lycee Francais Charles De Gaulle v Delambre (Age Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0563_10_0504 (05 April 2011)

The recommendations made by the Employment Tribunal were within its wide discretion under regulation 38, were practicable, addressed the adverse effects of discrimination on the Claimant, and were justified by the findings of fact. There was no error of law or excess of jurisdiction.

Citation
[2011] UKEAT 0563_10_0504
Parties
Claimant: Mrs [Claimant's Name Redacted]; Respondent: French Lycee (Respondent School)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Recommendations in Remedy Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Victimisation, Remedies, Recommendations, Employment Equality Age Regulations 2006
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Victimisation Remedies Recommendations Employment Equality Age Regulations 2006

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs [Claimant's Name Redacted]

Claimant

French Lycee (Respondent School)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Recommendations in Remedy Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in making three recommendations as part of the remedy for unlawful age discrimination and victimisation.

Ratio Decidendi

The recommendations made by the Employment Tribunal were within its wide discretion under regulation 38, were practicable, addressed the adverse effects of discrimination on the Claimant, and were justified by the findings of fact. There was no error of law or excess of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The recommendations of the Employment Tribunal are upheld.
  • No redrafting or limitation of the recommendations is required.