Andre v. LCR Telecom [2000] UKEAT 441_00_1511 (15 November 2000)

There is an arguable point that the Tribunal did not properly consider Section 97(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, warranting a full hearing on this ground.

Citation: [2000] UKEAT 441_00_1511
Parties: Appellant: G Andre; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 15 November 2000
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome: Leave granted to amend Notice of Appeal and proceed to full hearing on one ground.
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal, Effective Date of Termination

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Effective Date of Termination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

G Andre

Appellant

Unknown Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Employment Tribunal properly considered Section 97(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in determining the effective date of termination

Ratio Decidendi

There is an arguable point that the Tribunal did not properly consider Section 97(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, warranting a full hearing on this ground.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to amend Notice of Appeal and proceed to full hearing on one ground.

Orders

Amended Notice of Appeal to be lodged promptly
Full hearing to be scheduled, estimated duration 2 hours, Category C