Charles v Tesco Stores Ltd (Race Discrimination : Continuing act) [2012] UKEAT 0386_11_1901 (19 January 2012)
On the material before the Employment Judge, the complaint advanced was limited to delay and disparate treatment, with insufficient indication that the withdrawal of a compensation offer/agreement on 17 August 2010 was being advanced as a central act of discrimination. The Judge was entitled to find the claim out of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0386_11_1901
- Parties
- Appellant: G L Charles; Respondent: Tesco
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Limitation Periods, Preliminary Issues
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G L Charles
Appellant
Tesco
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding the claim out of time
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to address an allegation of discrimination relating to the withdrawal of a compensation offer/agreement on 17 August 2010
Ratio Decidendi
On the material before the Employment Judge, the complaint advanced was limited to delay and disparate treatment, with insufficient indication that the withdrawal of a compensation offer/agreement on 17 August 2010 was being advanced as a central act of discrimination. The Judge was entitled to find the claim out of time and there was no error of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment