Charles v Tesco Stores Ltd (Race Discrimination : Continuing act) [2012] UKEAT 0368_11_1901 (19 January 2012)
The Tribunal was entitled to conclude, based on the material before it, that the complaints related to delay and disparate treatment up to 4 June 2010, and not to the withdrawal of compensation on 17 August 2010. There was insufficient evidence that the latter was the central complaint. No error of law was identified.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0368_11_1901
- Parties
- Appellant: G L Charles; Respondent: Tesco
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Limitation Periods, Practice and Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G L Charles
Appellant
Tesco
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim was brought within the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether the withdrawal of a compensation offer constituted an act of discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to conclude, based on the material before it, that the complaints related to delay and disparate treatment up to 4 June 2010, and not to the withdrawal of compensation on 17 August 2010. There was insufficient evidence that the latter was the central complaint. No error of law was identified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment