Barclays Bank Plc -v- Game [2002] DRS 115 (7 January 2002)
The respondent used the domain name to attract visitors and benefit from the complainant's reputation, taking unfair advantage of the complainant's rights and causing detriment. The absence of any legitimate right or fair use by the respondent, combined with the likelihood of confusion and disruption to the complainant's business, constitutes abusive registration.
- Citation
- [2002] DRS 115
- Parties
- Complainant: Barclays Bank plc; Respondent: Game
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination Under Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Rights, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barclays Bank plc
Complainant
Game
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination Under Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent used the domain name to attract visitors and benefit from the complainant's reputation, taking unfair advantage of the complainant's rights and causing detriment. The absence of any legitimate right or fair use by the respondent, combined with the likelihood of confusion and disruption to the complainant's business, constitutes abusive registration.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain name barclaysbank.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment