Ian Daynes v Garth Piesse (Full Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17218 (03 June 2016)

Ian Daynes v Garth Piesse (Full Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17218 (03 June 2016)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17218
Parties
Complainant: Ian Daynes; Respondent: Garth Piesse
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
03 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name, Trade Mark, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Trade Mark Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Daynes

Complainant

Garth Piesse

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed