Mr A Mayes v Gartner UK Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2017] UKET 3323894/2017 (19 June 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the legislation and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal for making such a disclosure.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3323894/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr A Mayes; Respondent: Gartner UK Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 19 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr A Mayes

Claimant

Gartner UK Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the legislation and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal for making such a disclosure.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed