O'Shea v Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] UKFTT 1005 (GRC) (27 November 2023)
Disclosure of the value of the largest ISA would engage the statutory prohibition in section 23(1) of the CRCA, as it is information relating to a person and could enable identification, including self-identification. Section 44 of the FOIA therefore applies, and HMRC was entitled to refuse disclosure.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 1005 (GRC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Gary O'Shea; First Respondent: Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: HM Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Act Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Determination on the Papers
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Statutory Exemptions, Confidentiality of Tax Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary O'Shea
Appellant
Information Commissioner
First Respondent
HM Revenue & Customs
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Act Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Determination on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC was entitled to rely on section 44 of the FOIA to refuse disclosure of the value of the largest ISA
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of the value of the largest ISA would engage the statutory prohibition in section 23(1) of the CRCA, as it is information relating to a person and could enable identification, including self-identification. Section 44 of the FOIA therefore applies, and HMRC was entitled to refuse disclosure.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment