Sportingbet Plc (trading as Sportingbet) v Gavin Murphy (Full Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9552 (20 July 2011)
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the domain name was identical or similar, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
- Citation
- [2011] DRS 9552
- Parties
- Complainant: Sportingbet Plc (trading as Sportingbet); Respondent: Gavin Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Sportingbet Plc (trading as Sportingbet)
Complainant
Gavin Murphy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the domain name was identical or similar, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment