Clark Equipment Company v Hamlen [2007] DRS 4261 (27 February 2007)
The complainant has valid and subsisting rights in the BOBCAT trade mark, which is identical to the disputed domain name. The respondent's continued use of the domain name after termination of the distributorship agreement, in breach of contractual terms, and without distinguishing material, is likely to create the impression of a commercial connection with the complainant. This constitutes an abusive registration as it takes unfair advantage of or is unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4261
- Parties
- Complainant: Clark Equipment Company; Respondent: Geoff Hamlen
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Domain Name Disputes, Abusive Registration, Passing Off
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clark Equipment Company
Complainant
Geoff Hamlen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the BOBCAT mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has valid and subsisting rights in the BOBCAT trade mark, which is identical to the disputed domain name. The respondent's continued use of the domain name after termination of the distributorship agreement, in breach of contractual terms, and without distinguishing material, is likely to create the impression of a commercial connection with the complainant. This constitutes an abusive registration as it takes unfair advantage of or is unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred
Orders
- The domain name bobcat.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment