E A Gibson Shipbrokers Ltd v Staples [2008] UKEAT 0178_08_1710 (17 October 2008)
The Tribunal was entitled to conclude that a combination of reasonable adjustments could have enabled Mr Staples to return to work and that Gibsons failed in its duty under s4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. The Tribunal's approach to the identification and assessment of adjustments, the burden of proof, and the cumulative effect of adjustments was correct in law. The appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0178_08_1710
- Parties
- Appellant: Gibsons; Respondent: Mr Staples
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Unfair Dismissal, Burden of Proof, Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Sick Pay Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gibsons
Appellant
Mr Staples
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in its approach to the duty to make reasonable adjustments
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to make adequate findings on the adjustments required
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to conclude that a combination of reasonable adjustments could have enabled Mr Staples to return to work and that Gibsons failed in its duty under s4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. The Tribunal's approach to the identification and assessment of adjustments, the burden of proof, and the cumulative effect of adjustments was correct in law. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision upheld; sick pay issue to be determined at a future remedies hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment