Mr S Beltsos v Gilead Sciences Ltd and Mr T Whitehead (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2023] UKET 2207536/2022 (28 September 2023)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not suffer detriment as a result of making protected disclosures and dismissed the claim.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 2207536/2022
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr S Beltsos; Respondent: Gilead Sciences Ltd; Respondent: Mr T Whitehead
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr S Beltsos
Claimant
Gilead Sciences Ltd
Respondent
Mr T Whitehead
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making protected disclosures under the Public Interest Disclosure Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not suffer detriment as a result of making protected disclosures and dismissed the claim.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment