Film Unit Drivers Guild v Gocool [2006] DRS 3611 (19 June 2006)

Film Unit Drivers Guild v Gocool [2006] DRS 3611 (19 June 2006)

The complainant established rights in the name 'FILM UNIT DRIVERS GUILD' through evidence of use and goodwill. The domain name was found to be similar and its registration and use by the respondent constituted an abusive registration, as it caused confusion, blocked the complainant, and unfairly disrupted its business. The respondent's disclaimer was insufficient to prevent confusion or negate the abusive nature of the registration.

Citation
[2006] DRS 3611
Parties
Complainant: The Film Unit Drivers Guild; Respondent: Gocool
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Unregistered Trademark Rights, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Disputes Unregistered Trademark Rights Passing Off Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Film Unit Drivers Guild

Complainant

Gocool

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark similar to the disputed domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name 'FILM UNIT DRIVERS GUILD' through evidence of use and goodwill. The domain name was found to be similar and its registration and use by the respondent constituted an abusive registration, as it caused confusion, blocked the complainant, and unfairly disrupted its business. The respondent's disclaimer was insufficient to prevent confusion or negate the abusive nature of the registration.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • The disputed domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.