Ms E Mesirionye v Gold Care Homes (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2300001/2016 (20 February 2017)

Ms E Mesirionye v Gold Care Homes (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2300001/2016 (20 February 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered detriment for public interest disclosure, but did not establish race or disability discrimination. Breach of Working Time Regulations was found.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2300001/2016
Parties
Claimant: Ms E Mesirionye; Respondent: Gold Care Homes
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly upheld
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Public Interest Disclosure, Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Working Time Regulations
Employment Law Equality Law Disability Discrimination Public Interest Disclosure Race Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms E Mesirionye

Claimant

Gold Care Homes

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the claimant suffered disability discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the claimant suffered race discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered detriment for public interest disclosure, but did not establish race or disability discrimination. Breach of Working Time Regulations was found.

Court Disposition

Claim partly upheld

Orders

  • Compensation awarded for unfair dismissal
  • Compensation awarded for detriment due to public interest disclosure