R . A . M Ayrshire Limited (trading as Park Dental Care Kilmarnock) v Gr8webmedia (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 10103 (19 August 2011)

R . A . M Ayrshire Limited (trading as Park Dental Care Kilmarnock) v Gr8webmedia (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 10103 (19 August 2011)

The complainant established rights in the name and demonstrated that the domain name is identical or similar, and that the respondent registered and used the domain name in bad faith. No response was filed by the respondent.

Citation
[2011] DRS 10103
Parties
Complainant: R.A.M Ayrshire Limited (trading as Park Dental Care Kilmarnock); Respondent: Gr8webmedia
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Rights
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trade Mark Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R.A.M Ayrshire Limited (trading as Park Dental Care Kilmarnock)

Complainant

Gr8webmedia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and demonstrated that the domain name is identical or similar, and that the respondent registered and used the domain name in bad faith. No response was filed by the respondent.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.