Mr O Grandi and Mr E Murphy v Greene King Services Ltd and others: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Race Discrimination : Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2302387/2016 (31 May 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondents breached employment contracts, discriminated on grounds of race and sexual orientation, made unlawful deductions from wages, and failed to comply with Working Time Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2302387/2016
Parties: Claimant: Mr O Grandi; Claimant: Mr E Murphy; Respondent: Greene King Services Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 31 May 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claims upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Race Discrimination, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Transexualism, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Equality Law Breach of Contract Race Discrimination Sexual Orientation Discrimination Transexualism Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr O Grandi

Claimant

Mr E Murphy

Claimant

Greene King Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondents breached the claimants' employment contracts
2 Whether the respondents discriminated against the claimants on grounds of race and sexual orientation
3 Whether there were unlawful deductions from wages

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Claims upheld

Orders

Respondents to pay compensation to claimants
Respondents to rectify unlawful deductions

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.