Mr S McGee and Mr O Leacy v Grocery Delivery E-Services UK Ltd (T/a HelloFresh) (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2024] UKET 2600460/2023 (27 November 2024)
The Tribunal found that the claimants made protected disclosures and were subjected to unlawful detriment by the respondent.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 2600460/2023
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr S McGee; Claimant: Mr O Leacy; Respondent: Grocery Delivery E-Services UK Ltd (T/a HelloFresh)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr S McGee
Claimant
Mr O Leacy
Claimant
Grocery Delivery E-Services UK Ltd (T/a HelloFresh)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants were subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures under the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the claimants made protected disclosures and were subjected to unlawful detriment by the respondent.
Court Disposition
Claims upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay compensation to claimants
- Respondent to cease unlawful detriment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment