Mr S Hollis v Guardian Lightning Protection Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2019] UKET 2602705/2018 (2 April 2019)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore could not have suffered detriment as a result.
- Citation
- [2019] UKET 2602705/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr S Hollis; Respondent: Guardian Lightning Protection Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr S Hollis
Claimant
Guardian Lightning Protection Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
- 2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making the disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore could not have suffered detriment as a result.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment