United Kingdom Judgment

Gutmann v Vodafone Ltd and Vodafone Group PLC [2026] CAT 44 (11 May 2026)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the applicant met the threshold for certification of collective proceedings and that the pleadings disclosed a triable issue regarding abuse of dominance.

Court disposition

Application for collective proceedings certified

Orders

  • Collective proceedings certified under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr Justin Gutmann

Applicant

Vodafone Limited

Respondent

Vodafone Group PLC

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Competition Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant alleges that Vodafone abused its dominant position by overcharging consumers and seeks certification of collective proceedings.
Respondent
Vodafone denies abuse of dominance and challenges the suitability of collective proceedings.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 1998, Article 102 TFEU

    Abuse of dominant position under the Competition Act 1998 and Article 102 TFEU

  2. 02

    Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules

    Criteria for certification of collective proceedings

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the applicant met the threshold for certification of collective proceedings and that the pleadings disclosed a triable issue regarding abuse of dominance.

Court disposition

Application for collective proceedings certified

  • Collective proceedings certified under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2026] CAT 44

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal >> Gutmann v Vodafone Ltd and Vodafone Group PLC [2026] CAT 44 (11 May 2026) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2026/44.html Cite as: [2026] CAT 44 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Mr Justin Gutmann v Vodafone Limited and Vodafone Group PLC [2026] CAT 44 (11 May 2026) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 44.pdf BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2026/44.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 102 TFEU

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.