Hadee Engineering Co Ltd v Hannan [1997] UKEAT 1194_96_1806 (18 June 1997)
The Industrial Tribunal was entitled to consider the actual disciplinary approach taken by the employer, including the absence of permission and disciplinary history, and found the dismissal unfair. The assessment of 25% contributory conduct was not so far wrong as to warrant interference.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 1194_96_1806
- Parties
- Appellant: Hadee Engineering Co Ltd; Respondent: Anthony Hannan
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Contributory Conduct, Disciplinary Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hadee Engineering Co Ltd
Appellant
Anthony Hannan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of Mr Hannan was fair or unfair under the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978
- 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal misapplied the Burchell test
- 3 Whether the assessment of 25% contributory conduct was correct
Ratio Decidendi
The Industrial Tribunal was entitled to consider the actual disciplinary approach taken by the employer, including the absence of permission and disciplinary history, and found the dismissal unfair. The assessment of 25% contributory conduct was not so far wrong as to warrant interference.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the Industrial Tribunal stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment