Mr D Cheung v Halfords Ltd, Mr Mark Barrow (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2021] UKET 1310368/2020 (22 February 2021)
The tribunal determined whether the claimant's disclosures qualified as protected disclosures and whether any detriment or dismissal was causally linked to those disclosures.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 1310368/2020
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr D Cheung; Respondent: Halfords Ltd; Respondent: Mr Mark Barrow
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr D Cheung
Claimant
Halfords Ltd
Respondent
Mr Mark Barrow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
- 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal as a result of making a protected disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal determined whether the claimant's disclosures qualified as protected disclosures and whether any detriment or dismissal was causally linked to those disclosures.
Court Disposition
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment