Mr C Best v Halfords Ltd (England and Wales : Race Discrimination) [2023] UKET 2301168/2021 (3 February 2023)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which the tribunal could conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation, that the respondent had discriminated against him because of race. Accordingly, the claim was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 2301168/2021
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr C Best; Respondent: Halfords Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Unfair Treatment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr C Best
Claimant
Halfords Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of race in contravention of the Equality Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which the tribunal could conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation, that the respondent had discriminated against him because of race. Accordingly, the claim was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment