Mr M Antcliffe v Halo Express (Scotland : Breach of Contract : Unfair Dismissal : Working Time Regulations : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 4100793/2017 (31 July 2017)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding dismissal procedures, written statements, and working time, resulting in a finding for the claimant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 4100793/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr M Antcliffe; Respondent: Halo Express
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Unfair Dismissal, Working Time Regulations, Written Statements
Employment Law Breach of Contract Unfair Dismissal Working Time Regulations Written Statements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr M Antcliffe
Claimant
Halo Express
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
- 3 Whether there was a breach of Working Time Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding dismissal procedures, written statements, and working time, resulting in a finding for the claimant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant
Orders
- Compensation awarded to the claimant
- Respondent ordered to provide written statements if not already provided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment