Jaguar Land Rover Limited v HAMILTONS TAUNTON LTD (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17267 (25 May 2016)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied the requirements of the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Citation: [2016] DRS 17267
Parties: Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: HAMILTONS TAUNTON LTD
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 25 May 2016
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome: Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics: Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement

Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

HAMILTONS TAUNTON LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
2 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied the requirements of the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

The domain name is to be transferred to Jaguar Land Rover Limited.