Hewitt v Revenue & Customs (VAT - APPEALS : Extension of time) [2019] UKFTT 152 (TC) (28 February 2019)
The applicant failed to provide any reasonable excuse for not appealing within the statutory time limits, and the delay of over five years is serious and significant. The Tribunal prefers HMRC's arguments regarding finality and legal certainty, and dismisses the application for permission to appeal out of time.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 152
- Parties
- Applicant: Hampton George Hewitt; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal Extension of Time / Application for Permission to Bring Late Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to bring late appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Agricultural Flat Rate Scheme, Extension of Time, Appeal Rights, Limitation Periods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hampton George Hewitt
Applicant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal Extension of Time / Application for Permission to Bring Late Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has a reasonable excuse for failing to appeal within statutory time limits
- 2 Whether permission should be granted for a late appeal against HMRC's cancellation of AFRS registration
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide any reasonable excuse for not appealing within the statutory time limits, and the delay of over five years is serious and significant. The Tribunal prefers HMRC's arguments regarding finality and legal certainty, and dismisses the application for permission to appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to bring late appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal out of time is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment