Mr. Itay Hasid v Handsetfactor (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16103 (21 July 2015)

Mr. Itay Hasid v Handsetfactor (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16103 (21 July 2015)

The complainant established rights in the name and demonstrated that the registration was abusive; no response was filed by the respondent.

Citation
[2015] DRS 16103
Parties
Complainant: Mr. Itay Hasid; Respondent: Handsetfactor
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Transfer Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. Itay Hasid

Complainant

Handsetfactor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was registered in bad faith
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and demonstrated that the registration was abusive; no response was filed by the respondent.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.