Douglas Harvey v Hardmans Double Glazing Company Ltd and Mark Hardman (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2403104/2017 (16 October 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination, and that the respondents breached the Working Time Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2403104/2017
Parties: Claimant: Douglas Harvey; Respondent: Hardmans Double Glazing Company Ltd; Respondent: Mark Hardman
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 16 October 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Disability Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Douglas Harvey

Claimant

Hardmans Double Glazing Company Ltd

Respondent

Mark Hardman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of disability
3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination, and that the respondents breached the Working Time Regulations.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondents to pay compensation to the claimant
Respondents to comply with Working Time Regulations

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.