Collinson v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 165 (TC) (13 April 2010)
HMRC failed to demonstrate objectively reasonable grounds for not issuing a closure notice after more than nine years; the Applicant had cooperated and provided all documentation except privileged material, and HMRC had not exercised statutory powers to obtain it. Delay prejudices fair resolution and is not justified by generic scheme review or pending appellate decisions.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 165
- Parties
- Applicant: Harold Hugh Collinson; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Direction to Issue Closure Notice Under Section 28 a TMA / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Decision on Application
- Outcome
- Application granted; direction issued.
- Legal Topics
- Self Assessment Return, Closure Notice, Enquiry Procedure, Capital Gains Tax, Loss Relief, Relevant Discounted Security
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harold Hugh Collinson
Applicant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Direction to Issue Closure Notice Under Section 28 a TMA / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Decision on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC has shown reasonable grounds for not issuing a closure notice within a specified period under section 28A TMA
Ratio Decidendi
HMRC failed to demonstrate objectively reasonable grounds for not issuing a closure notice after more than nine years; the Applicant had cooperated and provided all documentation except privileged material, and HMRC had not exercised statutory powers to obtain it. Delay prejudices fair resolution and is not justified by generic scheme review or pending appellate decisions.
Court Disposition
Application granted; direction issued.
Orders
- HMRC is directed to issue a closure notice on or before 4.00 pm on 7 February 2010 in respect of the enquiry opened on 5 January 2001 into the Applicant’s tax return for 1998–1999.
- Both parties may make written submissions as to costs within specified periods.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment