Dritan Myziri v Harrods Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2019] UKET 2201018/2018 (18 November 2019)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 and therefore was not entitled to protection under the Act.

Citation: [2019] UKET 2201018/2018
Parties: Claimant: Dritan Myziri; Respondent: Harrods Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 18 November 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Dritan Myziri

Claimant

Harrods Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 and therefore was not entitled to protection under the Act.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed