Harrods Ltd v Remick [1995] UKEAT 397_95_1112 (11 December 1995)
Section 7 of the Race Relations Act 1976 applies to workers employed by concessionaires operating within Harrods, as the work performed was for Harrods' benefit and under its control, satisfying the statutory requirements. The Industrial Tribunals were correct in finding jurisdiction in the cases of Ms Remick and Mrs Seeley. The Tribunal erred in Mrs Elmi's case by failing to apply s.7 correctly; her work also fell within the protection of s.7.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 397_95_1112
- Parties
- Appellant: Harrods Ltd; Respondent: Ms Remick; Respondent: Mrs Seeley; Respondent: Mrs Elmi
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeals From Industrial Tribunal Decisions
- Outcome
- Harrods' appeals in the cases of Ms Remick and Mrs Seeley dismissed; Mrs Elmi's appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Contract Workers, Interpretation of Race Relations Act 1976 S.7, Employment Status, Principal Contractor Relationships
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrods Ltd
Appellant
Ms Remick
Respondent
Mrs Seeley
Respondent
Mrs Elmi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeals From Industrial Tribunal Decisions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Harrods Ltd is liable for race discrimination under s.7 of the Race Relations Act 1976 to workers not directly employed by them but by concessionaires operating within Harrods' store.
- 2 Whether the work performed by the respondents was 'work for' Harrods within the meaning of s.7 of the 1976 Act.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7 of the Race Relations Act 1976 applies to workers employed by concessionaires operating within Harrods, as the work performed was for Harrods' benefit and under its control, satisfying the statutory requirements. The Industrial Tribunals were correct in finding jurisdiction in the cases of Ms Remick and Mrs Seeley. The Tribunal erred in Mrs Elmi's case by failing to apply s.7 correctly; her work also fell within the protection of s.7.
Court Disposition
Harrods' appeals in the cases of Ms Remick and Mrs Seeley dismissed; Mrs Elmi's appeal allowed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal granted.
- Order for legal aid taxation of Ms Remick's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment